A comparative analysis of indigenous and contemporary child wellbeing in Tooro Kingdom
Abstract
This study aims to explore the comparative analysis of indigenous and contemporary child wellbeing practices in Tooro kingdom employing a qualitative approach. The research utilized focused group discussions, in-depth interviews, and key informant interviews. The study involved 23 participants who were in a category of elders, politicians, cultural leaders, district officials in charge of children welfare, retired teachers, kingdom officials among other stakeholders. The research was interested in finding the difference and similarities in both approach and what lacks in the contemporary approaches in child wellbeing among the Batooro people of Tooro kingdom. More so it was interested in finding out how indigenous knowledge can be utilized in providing solution to current problems facing children in Tooro kingdom and also how the different government programs can utilize them in providing solutions that are cultural responsive to people of Tooro. The findings revealed there are some commonalities between indigenous child welfare practice where by in all approaches a child was put at the center of everything and a child is the hope of the nation. Children wellbeing is crucial and paramount in both indigenous and current approaches to child wellbeing. On the other hand, the research found out some differences in child wellbeing practices where by the indigenous approach child wellbeing was a duty of every citizen within the Kingdom or society. The Batooro believed in collective approach in child up bring through the extended family and community as well. However, the current approach to child rearing is rights based and its more embed in the nuclear family system. The role of community is minimal. Children have a right to decide for themselves. Further research about the topic needed to be done to explore much more about the harmonization of both approaches. In conclusion indigenous approaches can be a great complementation to current approaches to child wellbeing and can provide relevant solutions to current problems facing children with the advantage of being contextual relevant and putting in consideration the principle of cultural sensitivity. By valuing and integrating both approaches, the kingdom and the country can create a robust system that addresses the diverse needs of its children. Ensuring that cultural heritage is preserved while embracing advancements in education, healthcare, and child protection will foster a more holistic and sustainable approach to child well-being and sustainable development.