• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak UD Home
    • College of Engineering, Design, Art and Technology (CEDAT)
    • School of Engineering (SEng.)
    • School of Engineering (SEng.) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak UD Home
    • College of Engineering, Design, Art and Technology (CEDAT)
    • School of Engineering (SEng.)
    • School of Engineering (SEng.) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Evaluation of thermal comfort and energy efficiency in institutional buildings

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Bachelor's Dissertation (1.693Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Agaba, Nobert
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study investigates the thermal comfort and energy performance of C-energy conference in Ntinda, prompted by occupant discomfort and escalating energy costs. Conducted from March 13 to April 13, 2025, the research aimed to assess compliance with ASHRAE 55 and 90.1 standards and propose strategies to optimize occupant satisfaction and energy efficiency. Data were collected over 35 sessions (Wednesdays and Fridays, 1:30 PM–3:30 PM) using environmental sensors to measure air temperature, relative humidity, air velocity, CO₂ concentration, and mean radiant temperature, alongside Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE) surveys capturing occupant thermal sensation, comfort ratings, clothing insulation, and activity levels. Energy consumption was analysed for air conditioning, lighting, and equipment loads. Results indicated that the average operative temperature (27.16°C) exceeded ASHRAE 55’s 26°C limit in 80% of intervals, with relative humidity (69.3%) often surpassing the 60% threshold. Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) values ranged from -1.08 to +2, with nearly 50% outside the ±0.5 comfort range, and Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied (PPD) reached up to 38%, exceeding the 10% limit in over 75% of intervals. Energy Use Intensity (EUI) was 252 kWh/m²/year, within ASHRAE 90.1 benchmarks, but the HVAC Coefficient of Performance (COP) was low at 1.5, indicating system inefficiencies. Regression analysis identified temperature as the primary driver of discomfort, with air velocity and humidity as secondary factors. Recommendations include upgrading to high-efficiency HVAC systems, implementing variable air volume or zoned mini-split configurations, enhancing ventilation with demandcontrolled systems, installing ceiling fans, and adding dehumidification to reduce latent heat loads. These interventions aim to achieve ASHRAE compliance, enhance occupant comfort, and lower operational costs, contributing to sustainable building performance in educational facilities.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12281/21982
    Collections
    • School of Engineering (SEng.) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak UDCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV