Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOpio, Emmanuel Obong
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-27T09:05:16Z
dc.date.available2023-10-27T09:05:16Z
dc.date.issued2023-10
dc.identifier.citationOpio, E., O. (2023). Local community response towards human wildlife conflicts in selected districts neighboring Karuma Wildlife Reserve; unpublished dissertation, Makerere Universityen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12281/16763
dc.descriptionA special research project report submitted to the College of Veterinary Medicine Animal Resources and Biosecurity in partial fulfilment for the award of a Degree of Bachelor of Veterinary Medicine of Makerere Universityen_US
dc.description.abstractIn Oyam and Kiryandongo districts, human wildlife conflicts are common because of the close proximity of these areas to Karuma Wildlife Reserve. Most of the people in these areas are crop farmers though a few keep animals, the biggest population depends on crop farming for food and as sources of income. However, losses caused by wild life causes a great decline in crop production which directly or indirectly affects household income which could lead to increased poverty. In this study, a multistage random sampling was used to select 70 survey respondents from Oyam and Kiryandongo district with a main objective of assessing local community responses towards human wildlife conflicts. Data was collected using survey questionnaires and analyzed using Microsoft excel 2010 and SPSS version 27 and results explained using descriptive statistics, tables, pie-charts and bar graphs. The results showed crop destruction as the highest type of human wildlife conflict and higher in Kiryandongo representing 100% and 96.7% in Oyam respectively. Elephants and baboons were most incriminated for destruction with baboons reported in Kiryandongo representing 95% and 80% in Oyam respectively. Maize was the most destroyed crop in both districts with 80% in Kiryandongo and 90% in Oyam respectively. The frequency of human wildlife conflicts was higher in Kiryandongo compared to Oyam, 60% of respondents had conflicts both day and night in Kiryandongo compared to 36.7% in Oyam. In both districts, majority of respondents claimed they reported issues with wildlife to authorities with 67.7% reporting complaints to UWA. Traps were set by 43.3% of respondents in Oyam which was higher compared to Kiryandongo (32.5%). In Oyam (96.7%) respondents guarded their gardens to prevent destruction by wildlife and was higher compared to Kiryandongo (80%), majority of guarding work was done by fathers (45.8%) and children (28.8%). The effective responses were group chasing, setting fire, blowing vuvuzelas, beating jerrycans and guarding gardens.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMakerere Universityen_US
dc.subjectHuman wildlife conflictsen_US
dc.titleLocal community response towards human wildlife conflicts in selected districts neighboring Karuma Wildlife Reserveen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record