Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKamukama, Phionah
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-25T14:22:37Z
dc.date.available2024-01-25T14:22:37Z
dc.date.issued2023-09
dc.identifier.citationKamukama, P. (2023). Assessment of human wildlife interactions, benefits attained and challenges faced by communities bordering Kibale National Park (Unpublished undergraduate dissertation). Makerere University, Kampala, Ugandaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12281/18423
dc.descriptionA research report submitted to the College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity in partial fulfillment of requirements for the award of Bachelor’s Degree in Wildlife Health and Management of Makerere Universityen_US
dc.description.abstractThe growing population, expansive development, global climate change and other environmental aspects put people and wildlife in competition for scarce resources and hence, unavoidable interactions of humans with animals in different environmental settings. The purpose of this study was to assess the human wildlife interactions, benefits and challenges faced by communities bordering Kibale national park. Data was collected using key informant interviews and structured questionnaires. 10 key informants and 130 respondents from Kanyawara parish were interviewed. The results showed that majority of the humans encounter the wild animals and the areas or points of interactions were mainly the gardens (70%), at home (29.2%) and at the well (9.3%). Major animals encountered were elephants (97.7%), baboons (69.2%) and black and white colobus monkeys (7.7%). In addition to that results also showed that challenges like crop raiding (81.5%), injuries (4.6%) from animal attacks, disease spread (14.6%), school dropout (1.5%) and psychological torture (0.8%) were faced by the Kanyawara communities. Different measures were applied to reduce the negative impacts of animal presence like hitting jerry cans (33.8%), setting up fires (12.3%), calling rangers (13.8%) and guarding gardens (7.7%). The community could however adopt the use of light and noise in various forms as immediate measures to counter problem animal incidences. Revenue sharing and compensation initiatives should consider the people in the hotspots as beneficiaries of the lion’s share due to the magnitude of the negative impact of the animal presence on their livelihood. Fencing of the park boundaries as suggested by the communities could be done so as to prevent animals from crossing to the community land. Further studies should be done on the social implications of the animal presence in local communities. These include school dropout rate, mental health and family feudsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMakerere Universityen_US
dc.subjectHuman wildlife interactionsen_US
dc.subjectKibale National Parken_US
dc.titleAssessment of human wildlife interactions, benefits attained and challenges faced by communities bordering Kibale National Parken_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record