Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorElasu, Domenic
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-24T06:37:54Z
dc.date.available2021-03-24T06:37:54Z
dc.date.issued2021-03
dc.identifier.citationElasu, D. (2021). Intra-household differences in maize plot management and effect on food security: a case of Kamuli district. Undergraduate dissertation. Makerere Universityen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12281/9766
dc.descriptionA special project submitted to the School of Agricultural Sciences in partial fulfillment for the award of Bachelor of Science in Agriculture Degree of Makerere Universityen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study analyzed intra-household differences in maize plot management and their effect on household food security using data collected from a sample of 920 farmers in Kamuli District as a case study. The data was collected in 2019 by icipe and Makerere University. The objectives of the study were; (1) to determine the proportion of households with jointly-managed maize plots and households with individually-managed maize plots, (2) to determine maize productivity on jointly-managed maize plots and individually-managed maize plots, and (3) to determine and compare food security status in households with jointly-managed maize plots and households with individually-managed maize plots. Objectives 1 and 2 were analyzed using descriptive statistics whereas objective 3 was analyzed using descriptive statistics and Poisson regression. Results from descriptive statistics showed that the proportion of households with jointly-managed maize plots (42.82%) were less than households with individually-managed maize plots (57.18%). In addition, findings revealed no significant difference between maize productivity on jointlymanaged and individually-managed maize plots. Concerning food security, households with jointly-managed maize plots were shown to be significantly more food secure relative to households with individually-managed maize plots. This is because the former have a higher household dietary diversity score (mean = 6.53, median = 7.00) than the latter (mean = 6.05, median = 6.00). Econometric results from the Poisson regression showed that maize plot management in households does not matter in household food security. The results however revealed that education of spouse, access to extension by male farmers, access to extension by female farmers, and the size of land allocated to maize significantly increase household food security. On the other side, household head, distance to the extension office, and crop diversity significantly reduce household food security. It is recommended that policymakers identify and address the causes of individual maize plot management rather than joint plot management to improve maize productivity and food security. In addition, extension services and better education should be provided to farmers particularly female farmers who exhibit a greater positive impact on household food security more than their male counterparts. Furthermore, policies that encourage the cultivation of more maize in terms of acreage should be adopted.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMakerere Universityen_US
dc.subjectFood securityen_US
dc.subjectHousehold dietary diversity scoreen_US
dc.subjectMaizeen_US
dc.subjectIntra-householden_US
dc.titleIntra-household differences in maize plot management and effect on food security: a case of Kamuli districten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record