Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMalingha, Stanley
dc.contributor.authorMugyenyi, Samson
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-05T11:23:25Z
dc.date.available2022-05-05T11:23:25Z
dc.date.issued2021-02
dc.identifier.citationMugyenyi, Samson and Malingha, Stanley. (2021). Comparing physically based and empirical models in predicting the sediment yield from urban watersheds Case study: Lubigi Catchment. (Unpublished undergraduate dissertation) Makerere University; Kampala, Uganda.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12281/12157
dc.descriptionA research report submitted to the College of Engineering Design and Art in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of a degree Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering of Makerere University.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe performance of many urban drainage systems in Uganda has been affected by sediment deposition in drainage channels. These sediments reduce their carrying capacity leading to flooding that causes destruction of property and poor standards of living. Models have been used to predict the sediment yield from bigger river catchments but very little modelling has been carried out for the sediment yield in these urban catchments. Therefore, using a case study of Lubigi Catchment, this study predicted the sediment yield from the watersheds of these urban channels using a physically based model i.e. Water Erosion Prediction Project(WEPP) and an empirical model i.e. Universal Soil Loss Equation(USLE). The model output results were then compared with the actual measured load in the channel so as to determine the prediction accuracy of these models. Water sampling from the channel was carried out thrice a month and the samples were taken to the laboratory to determine their sediment concentration. This sediment concentration was multiplied with the measured discharge to obtain the sediment load. The measured sediment yield was 387.78 ton/month in January, 611.01 ton/month in February, 559.12 ton/month in March and 454.61 ton/month in November The inputs for the WEPP model were the DEM climate file, land use file and a soil file. The sediment yield obtained was 557 ton/month in January, 770.53 ton/month in February, 733.38 ton/month in March and 683.39 ton/month in November. For USLE, the required files were the DEM, monthly rainfall data, satellite images and the soil map. The sediment yield obtained was 648.96 ton/month in January, 992.99 ton/month in February, 1106.56 ton/month in March and 948.48 ton/month in November. These models were used in conjunction with GIS software to enable the determination of both the spatial and total monthly sediment yield for Lubigi catchment. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify parameters that most influenced the predicted sediment yield. The Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) was used to evaluate model performance with NSE values greater than 0.5 regarded as satisfactory performance. Calibration was done using the January to March dataset while validation was carried out using the November dataset. This study also involved design of a sediment detention pond to reduce the amount of sediment deposited in Lubigi drainage channel. The sediment pond was to be constructed at Kalerwe, Bwaise and Namugoona and was to be desilted every seven months. The pond volume was divided into the settling zone (1454.76m3) and the sediment storage zone (727.38m3).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMakerere Universityen_US
dc.subjectEmpirical modelsen_US
dc.subjectSediment yielden_US
dc.subjectUrban watershedsen_US
dc.subjectLubigi Catchmenten_US
dc.titleComparing physically based and empirical models in predicting the sediment yield from urban watersheds Case study: Lubigi Catchmenten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record